Essie fill the gap erfahrungen professional#

As a traumatic event, cancer not only brings great physical and mental harm to patients, but also poses a threat to the physical and psychological health of caregivers.

Such feedback supports the feasibility and acceptability of the Couplelinks program while offering directions for improvement of online couple-based interventions in cancer.Ĭancer-related fatigue is one of the most common adverse reactions to cancer survivors, which has a significant impact on the daily life. Experiential gains noted by participants included that the program: helped couples to open channels of communication prompted them to designate quality time for one another evoked feelings of unity and togetherness and inspired new insight in the relationship.

Essie fill the gap erfahrungen professional#

Participants also reported that including a professional facilitator humanized the intervention, served as motivation to progress through the program, facilitated insight into their relationship, and was reassuring. Subjective data revealed participants valued the convenience and flexibility of the online intervention and appreciated the program’s involvement of both partners. The majority of participants considered the facilitator’s role to be necessary 4.6 ( SD = 0.60), and found the program to be convenient 4.1 ( SD = 0.81) despite some participants struggling to keep up with the modules. Participants reported an overall satisfaction rating of 4.3 out of 5 ( SD = 0.54) with patient satisfaction ratings being higher than that of male partners’ ( p = 0.01). A thematic analysis was undertaken in order to understand, organize and summarize the qualitative textual feedback. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize satisfaction ratings and generalized linear models with fixed effect for gender were used to test for differences in male-female outcomes. The primary objectives were to examine participants’ perceptions of: the online intervention’s structure and content the value of including a professional facilitator and benefits and drawbacks of the program.Ī treatment satisfaction questionnaire comprised of Likert indices and open-ended questions pertaining to treatment satisfaction was completed by 26 patients and 27 male partners ( N = 53) approximately 1–2 weeks following the intervention which occurred in the context of a randomized controlled trial. The program included six experiential learning exercises (plus one optional module), psychoeducational information, and support from a personal mental health professional. This study evaluated participant satisfaction with “Couplelinks,” an online psychological intervention designed for younger couples coping with breast cancer. However, further studies are needed to evaluate the efficacy of couple-based interventions and, to identify for whom and how they are more effective. Psychological interventions for couples coping with breast cancer appear to be effective for both women and their partners. The results obtained were mixed in regard to efficacy, although the overwhelming majority of studies (eight studies) found benefits for both women and their partners in some dimensions, such as quality of life, psychological distress, relationship functioning and physical symptoms associated with cancer. Data were extracted from each study regarding study sample characteristics, design, results and methodological limitations. Of 129 abstracts, 13 were extracted for further analysis and a final ten studies were deemed eligible for inclusion.

Rigorous inclusion and exclusion criteria were utilised. Studies identified by a searching multiple literature databases related to health and psychology between 19. The aim of the present systematic review is to identify and describe psychological interventions for couples coping with breast cancer and evaluate their efficacy. This can be explained, at least in part, by the absence of knowledge about the efficacy of this kind of intervention. Information about psychological intervention with couples coping with breast cancer is not well-disseminated.